Search results

It's fine for Garrone to behave like that to Cassano if he personally is willing to fill the 10m gap created by not getting proper value for Cassano. Instead, he didn't get that, didn't reinvest the Pazzini cash, and got Samp relegated. While I like to see people standing up to players...

Maybe. What I don't understand is that some people used Samp's rubbish season as a reason to criticise those two. If anything, surely it shows they were very important to the club and did a good job there.

Not really. He would have just sold Cassano for his market value if that was the case. Instead he tried to sack him and force him out. Pazzini may have been greed, but Cassano was more about Garrone's ego.

:agree: It was a truly spectacular collapse.