Search results

This is wont happen, your blood pressures can rest easy.

You made a funneh :D If we hadnt spent near 50m already, it would be funnier, its actually hilariously sad to read Galliani celebrating keeping a player as the only major signing, even if just trolling and will make some "key signing (read: loan) in deadline.

My harddrive was broke? I didnt know hehe. And priorities dammit, fucking Borriello is rumoured to weasel his way back in...:scared:

He should go, or shouldnt have come. Wouldnt have started him (duuuh) but tonight he isnt even in top 3-4 worst players, mainly because he played with more aggressive attitude then most of our complacent players, and had couple of decent link ups. Vidal, Marchi and especially Lichty were...

How does people not know what the most common calcio chant means :D And no to Borriello, thanks for the effort, but not good enough. At best ok as fringe fringe player, but need to do better still.

And what do you analyze about strikers who go 1 year without scoring? (both of them have) And struggle to score double digits majority of the seasons in their over decade long average careers?

Missing out big time :D DY-NOOOO-MIIIIIIIITE :D

Ofcourse not, no team needs a poor player, they just settle for them out of incompetence or lack of options.

Because he saw tactical use in Borriello's ARCHETYPE as a player that he wanted to try out, but since clearly the player has shown himself to be extremely limited one that goes out of ze window. Conte and Juve can sign an actual competent prima punta and which would easily make Conte forget a...

No offense to AndreaCristiano, but most arguments he is involved in is like this :P

Well ofcourse, nothing wrong with that, that goal meant alot to Borriello like it is for any striker who goes without scoring a full year. What I found disagreeable and farfetched is you saying this means he will be signed because of Conte being passionately crazy happy about possible scudetto...

Everyone were starting over Ale before Borriello got here too. Dont see how this is some big argument, Conte wanted another striker added to the team in January, one who is a target man prolly, and Marrotta got him a player that is easy to get and which Marrotta likes (same Marrotta who...

Great time to score :star: Even its likely to be the only goal he ever scores for us grazie mille :tup:

Its according to sky sport italia... But still very little chance we will actually buy him, not because he is poor, but because Roma will expect more profit from him then we would even consider prolly.

I asked you simple question, who played better between the two? Borriello was only a sub, but still, enough time judge his performance for sure, and was there a difference between his and Vucinic to you?

Dont ask, you wont like the answer, same dude who told me we shouldnt get Cavani because we would be reminded too much of being Napoli "developed" player and that Borriello will come good for us, that he is just going through what every striker goes through :pp (not realizing this IS Borriello's...

Conte clearly likes him, pretty much first he thinks of subbing in when not starting, even how he is most likely celebrating the goals with being him as I noticed, is bit of an indication too.

Thats what I said to my bro when I saw the lineup before the game started, baffled me and joked our defenders must be allowing him to look WC in training to troll him, because he isnt surely showing it game time... It ended up with him having one of the worst performances I seen a Juve player...