Search results

Your post says nothing that interests me whatsoever. Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk

Years prior to it Rumsfeld actually helped them get their chemical stock pile significantly during the war (state official and not just companies like it was with West Germany, Soviets). In the attack and strategy of itself, thank God for declassified files or we would still be accused of...

She is not wrong about it as a general rule but it was sickening she name dropped Halabja like her govt had no major hand in it. Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk

The source site aside, thats an extremely interesting article :tup:

What are they supposed to say tho? Turkey shouldnt be able to want to control their airspace?

They were fairly cruel as fuck animals in general (the nazis taking all the press makes people forget what insane madmen the japanese extremist officers were) but there were some leading good officers in emperial army that made it a point to be "nice" to some enemy officers after subduing them...

False sense of honour and chivalry has allways been amusing to see in wars. Kinda like how the Japanese in WW2 took great pride in being hospitable to enemy officers or what not, only to quickly mass murder and rape anything in sight in insane scale.

I'm not disputing that nor am I suprised. But he sounded suprised aircrafts who are there to bomb and kill get taken out themselves. And good luck trying to make groups you have complete firepower superiority to, to adhere to your specific standards of when to kill or not to kill. Especially...

The ones they are trying to bomb? Pilots being shot down in a warzone is pretty much the norm. The difference this time is they have such aireal superiority that they dont get casaulties usually and just bomb away anywhere they want.

It sound like you were indirectly complaining of your media reporting about collateral damage by linking it with the Russians airstrikes (ofcourse a media would be more invested in reporting more about its govts /air force actions). Wouldn't exactly see it as much of a critique they "report"...

You think highlighting civilians you kill is a bad thing? :lol: To the answer to your question, do they report on what the Russians done in Ukraine, or Georgia previously? If so, the answer is a given.

This below article has a bit biased agenda, but it offers a different perspective to the previous question: http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-09-04/why-don-t-gulf-states-accept-more-refugees- Why Don't Gulf States Accept More Refugees? Leonid Bershidsky 179 SEPT 4, 2015 10:26...

The reason is the gulf state regimes are inhuman filth. Even if they had no major hand in creating this conflict, they wouldnt take any refugees still. And the few they do, they would treat like vermin. Not even non-arabs (that they treat like slaves), but you have arabs like palestinians who...

I considered putting it in the wtf thread, but this was too wtf even for that thread.

Yeah like.... you guys wont believe this...its a must see: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=15f_1393628931

Same woman I saw in Sky news live twice last night? Presidential advisor? She was interesting, in two ways, first for putting it well how western media likes to simplify things and didnt bring how how they are given some of the needed concessions asked by the people etc. That was a good point...