Search results

Yeah it's solid entertainment, and the 5th one is legitimately a great movie, but if you're not watching it as a child it's nothing special at all.

Did you manage to avoid all the spoilers? :D

This island definitely will play a role in the future, no way that was put in just because.

It would be quite an extreme stretch, and a very cheap move on their part imo, you noticed how many assumption you had to take for that to be true. Not saying that it can't be true, but I think they'd have to come up with a very very good explanation.

It wouldn't make much sense for her to be Kylo's sibling, Han & Leia really talk about Kylo as if he were their only child. Luke as a father would be the most obvious choice, but I got a feeling that it could be a misdirect.

It never could have anyways. In favor of the movie, it's extremely difficult to make a well-received Star Wars movie anyways, so I can't blame it too much for playing it safe, even uf ut's to the extreme extent that it did.

Yeah, the part of the movie after the deathstar 3.0 was introduced I'd actually call shitty (bar the last scene and Han's death). Up to Maz' cantina it was pretty great, in between mediocre imo. Most importantly however I can imagine that after playing it this very very safe in this movie, it...

Cool it guys :D Btw Völler didn't even say that it was a bad or shitty movie - neither did I, it's mediocre to good in my opinion. - - - Updated - - - Well, that is my main issue, and it's a rather big one I'd argue - paying homage or reference to it is fine, and it's done very well in the...

Btw something I find pretty weird no one as pointed out yet, is that the premise of the move basically says fuck you to everything Luke, Leia & Co. have supposedly achieved during the original trilogy. 20 years after their grand victory the Empire is back basically stronger than ever, with an...

No, the second half of the movie is simply bad rehashing and illogical plotlines that are in no way better than in your average brainless action movie. You can say that you still loved the movie of course, and that's fine, but please don't act as if these issues don't exist. And I wanted to...

True. There can't be any other explanation for any review rating this higher than ~7/10 tbh. - - - Updated - - - http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/21/star-wars-and-decadence/?_r=0 This review is basically perfect (you can ignore the first part).

Also, most movies that previously held those records were pretty shit/mediocre (just like this one :snoop:)

Dafuq kinda parties did you go to :P

Darth Toleco meh.

It makes a lot of sense that Jar Jar as a sith was the original plan for the prequels, but I very very much doubt it has any impact on future films :D

Imagine if the new one's are as bad as Phantom Menace :lol: But the probably won't exept, some solid, okay movies, kinda like the new Star Trek.

My order is fucking horrible, only turned out that way as I was about 10 and watched them on the TV, which showed a movie every week. I missed the 5th one the first time around and only watched it a year later or something like that :lol:

Interesting, but not a bad idea :tup: I had a really random order, 1-2-3-4-6-5:D