Search results

  1. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    We didn't play 3-5-2 vs. Siena........................................... Vucinic came on in the 68th after we had already killed them with the 3-5-2, they were down to 10.
  2. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    Except he's wrong lol. :sergio:
  3. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    We played 4-3-3 vs. Siena. This board is a joke I swear. :sergio:
  4. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    I honestly don't see what is wrong with this formation. We have won 4 out of our last 5 with it, including wins vs. Roma, Udinese and Milan. Just today we had TWENTY NINE attempts on goal. And I swear you guys forget our first encounter with Catania while using 4-3-3.
  5. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    Giach 2 goals.
  6. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    Vidal takes the PKs because in FIFA his PK rating is 88 which is extremely high.
  7. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    Also, we draw so much because we have 3 CMs at all times. With Marchisio in poor form, none of them can score goals. Pirlo + Vidal in the middle with 4 attackers would be a goal show, but we would have the chance of conceding as well. It's a risk we should take though IMO.
  8. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    So dramatic. Slowly conditioned by what? We are cheering a fucking football team. OBVIOUSLY our recent draws are total shit. Prior to that we were doing ok.
  9. MikeM

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-1 Catania (Feb. 18th 2012)

    3 CMs hurts our ability to score unless Marchisio is in super form which he's not. How no one can see this is mystifying. We need to change one of the CMs for an attacker who plays either beside the top striker or behind him. Yes, we will increase the pressure on our defense by not having such a...