Search results

We reached our CL final in 2017 despite Higuain. He was instrumental in the final, though.

The only problem is Suarez is still 10 times the player Higuain is. Granted, this isn't much these days, but still.

This.

Very bad moves indeed. We built our startinf 11 in 2012 for what? Maybe 50m? And compare that to spending 180 on 3 players that could not play 1 single minute for the entire seasona and it wouldn't make a difference.

I look at all the aspects. I look at his goals and also his misses and complete disappearances. And most importantly, just because he scored goals for us, doesn't mean with be worse without him. He scored 36 goals for Napoli and 0 for us in 2016 and we still won. We never needed him for Serie A...

Higuain was always ending like this regardless of Ronaldo. And we didn't need Higuain go win Serie A, while everybody knew he was going to be useless in the CL. Of course, it's about the money. Every transfer needs to be judged that way because it's resources that could have gone elsewhere...

Always thought we should buy players that can score for us but that's an interesting approach.

That aged well

Are you really trying to justify that transfer? One of the worst pieces of business in history of football.

Loaning him with option instead of obligation was a terrible decision. We needed a miracle so that for a full year Milan and Chelsea wouldn't be able to find out how shit he was.

Cronios jerked off on that transfer. Why wasn't that a red flag for everyone? Our new Amauri.

He seemed slow to control the ball but then great finishing.

This performance was much for like what we expect from him.

Dybala can do that and much more.

Indeed, Lukaku for Dybala tops it easily.

It guarantees another scudetto, if he starts for Napoli.

Not inexplicable, just bad. It's not like this was an inexpected development.

Let it go man. This guy is finished.

So do Inter, Milan and especially Roma fans.

No. And it's not just Argentina. No wonder his CL record is comical.