Search results

If we sold him for eighteen million today, that eighteen million could buy us so much more than it did when we bought Trez, so we'd be a getting a deal really...

It would be a no-brainer to sell Trez and buy Zlatan. We would even have money left over and have upgraded our attack. What reason would there be not to do it?

Del Piero is the ONLY forward who creates, and that's and important thing to realise. We may have midfielders who can pass, but Del Piero is the man who most often is called upon to deliver the assist. It would be perfect to sell Trez to Chelsea, they'll pay way too much for him and we can...

That's not balance, that's polarization. If Del Piero is partnered with a player who can also create and score, then he will be more effective because he will not have the burden of creating all the chances and finishing some too. We need a forward like Sheva or RVN who finishes more than they...

I think that the comparison has to be made to get an idea of where we need to go to get a great attack. A great attack needs a great striker, and Trez is not that.

Comparing RVN and Henry is foolish. They are each as good as each other, but in different ways. They both create and they both finish, but differently. RVN is bigger and heads better, but Henry is faster and serves the ball better. I think the point is that they are both superior to Trezeguet.

Niether could Inzaghi, but that worked pretty well.