Search results

  1. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    Easy fix for that. Stadium name rights.:vinny:
  2. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    You kept possession with the 4-3-3. It's just pressure footie and that takes a toll. - - - Updated - - - Looking at his coaching career one could argue that he's been anything but stubborn as far as his tactical choices. If he is stubborn, it's definitely something he picked up recently.
  3. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    You guys played 4-3-3 the whole first half of last year. But as the team got tired Conte switched to the 3-5-2 and saw that Juve could still control the match, but also save energy. Juve don't necessarily need wingers to be successful. They do need more work rate up top. You can really...
  4. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    It could be like a 433 with a false 9. :boh:
  5. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    It's very odd to say the least. He doesn't even tinker with the 352 and you can do a lot tactically with the 352. - - - Updated - - - Excusio.
  6. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    That's B/S. As you say Giach, Isla and Giovinco could all play there, especially against the bottom teams. Even Giovinco could play behind the strikers in a 4312.
  7. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    It's almost like he's afraid to go back to 4-3-3. Even at the end of matches.:boh:
  8. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    He's not used to having to switch things up "in game". Hopefully he isn't one of those coaches that just freezes when things don't go his way.
  9. Enron

    What's missing... ??

    3-5-2 is a great formation. Juve's problem is that it doesn't change much. It's played the same way every single match. Adding midfielders that can play further up the pitch and a striker or two with more work rate than a slug would make the attack more dangerous. In addition, Juve rely too...