Search results

40M is a really fair valuation I think. The case is we need some money and the Kulusevski option was an easy oppurtunity to raise some money. He is an okay-ish player for subtop level clubs like Dortmund, Spurs etc. He could be useful for Juve but will not be a world beater. I agree on this deal.

I do not dislike him, but we have to be honest. He is not on Juve's level and I think he won't in the future. Every bid above 30 million we should accept, because his value would be lower after another season of dissapointment. He is too slow, not agile, need too much space and time to pull a...

If we could sell him for +- 40m to a garbage EPL club, we should do it. He is nothing special in our shirt, for Sweden he is better oddly enough.

He did literally nothing first half. I am not even joking ...

I agree. I watched some Parma games and Kulu highlights this year and everything he does looks clumsy. The first goal yesterday was like he did it by accident. That said, his goals and assists stats are good for a 20 years old and I like his vision. Maybe he is just that type of clumsy looking...

In 2010 Atalanta relegated to Serie B in 2016 they placed for Europa League and it was their best performance ever since 1932. They board + Gasp doing big things/.

Atalanta bought him for 168.000 and now sell him for 44m :touched:

I am not 100% convinced by Kulusevski to be honest. Could be a nuovo Berna or worse Pjaca. Seems like a similar type of player, but I hope I am not being right. Still prefer a good midfielder instead of a winger/AM who only plays 6 months in Serie A.