Search results

Then why did we always have those Modric vs. Diego arguments? Clearly you were pissed. That's fine, but don't hold it against Diego. Buck has a lot of weird ratings. I wouldn't be surprised if Grosso was a top five player for him this year. It wasn't better at all. Krasic hasn't done...

There's a lot of sour grapes in there. Constantly bringing up Modric with regards to Diego is a sure sign of being a bit frustrated we didn't sign your boy. And by all means, we should have certainly signed the Luca. I just wish you wouldn't lie. Cannavaro was horrible for half the season...

Not always, but in some cases, yes. Now who was the player of the season last year?

There isn't anything more pathetic than hating on a player just because your butt-buddy Modric wasn't selected. We all know you feel insulted because you're a dimwitted Croat who should probably join Barkuss on the front-lines towards a dirt coffin, but you don't see me crying over the fact we...

Well, to be honest, I'm not. So at least you got that right. :tup:

And here you are again, blaming our finish entirely on Diego. The "logic" you present is similar to many other gems we've witnessed on here, like Paro is better than Fabregas, or Alonso is too slow for Serie A. You don't offer any "logic" at all, just a bunch of lies. Modric is certainly a...

OK, so who was?

Then who was it, then? Oh let me guess, Sissoko and Marchisio.

He was the best player in a poor Juventus. You can't seem to admit that. Why? Well, you're still upset we didn't buy Modric. Hopefully Modric doesn't do anything with the rest of career, taking a page out of your pathetic book.

I don't think any manager in their right-mind would want to single out a certain player as the main threat. But when you use the straight 4-4-2, of course you're going to rely heavily on the wingers, it's the whole basis of the system. In some of these retarded 4-4-2's you have one winger who...

He made Bremen worse? Way to purport a lie.

And you would be wrong, because Krasic hasn't been effective whatsoever since November and the system is indeed built around him. The majority of the play goes through him and he's the main attacking outlet in midfield. I don't think some of you have even played a day of football on the pitch.

You need to be "world class" to make it as an attacking midfielder? So all the players who aren't world class but do well for their clubs didn't make it? :lol: That goes to show how little you know about the game. Stick with the work out tips, not football.

If you said the same thing about Diego, I might respect your opinion. But you didn't, so you're a hypocrite. In what way is Krasic more useful than Diego?

Same goes for Krasic. He was our big signing and he's been a big failure, performing to a lower standard than Diego.

Nobody said we would win the CL, that's bollocks. And the prices paid are simply market value, not Diego's fault. But you don't understand markets, so who cares what you say. In what way? That's just your bullshit opinion, like that of some drug addict on the streets of Zagreb. In...

I understand what you're saying. You think the trequartista position is more important than the RM slot. But the only thing that matters is what sort of players you have in each position, that's it.

I'm sorry, but that's just a silly way to look at things. There are all sorts of teams who have wingers that are more important than the trequartista behind the striker. It doesn't matter who's better at their respective position compared to other players. Diego is a more talented player than...

Pretty much. It obvious to everyone here the 4-2-3-1 was the way to go, regardless of fullbacks. Ciro really screwed up there.

Yes, because he's the best player. It all depends on where your best player is located. Your theory is debunked by looking at Roma under Spalletti. Perrotta played in the "trequartista" position behind Totti, but he wasn't the main player in attack, Totti was. Look at Real. Ozil plays as...