Search results

But then again, Nadal is one top player and Roddick isn't that far behind Agassi. Don't see much of a difference here.

Had Federer not been around and only Hewitt, Roddick, Nadal etc then people would have said it's tight competition between them all, and Nadal is just like Sampras while Roddick isn't far from Agassi and so on.. But then again I agree too many maybe's or probabilities, we can't really know or...

Exactly.

Becker yes, haven't followed much Courrier. But I don't even agree with the idea of Federer not having a tough competition. Is it probably because he's too strong for any great random player?

Yes true.

Same goes to Sampras, he never had anyone to challenge him much at that time but Andrei Agassi. P.S in Tennis trophies count, not the encounters with this player or that. Federer is on top.

Fair enough my man.

Almost the greatest ever.

Ah okay. I thought there are other reasons for not standing him.

Why? He's class, great, always puts a nice performance, unbeatable for a long time, respectable, too good to be true. I don't see why would anyone dislike him.

Federer is heading towards the best tennis player of all time.

Over-rated.