Search results

You lost be at the bold part :lol:

Yep and Juve follow this model and Don't let emotion or anything interfere. If we lose him in the future, we lose him. The club is bigger than the player and exactly like you said, if the contract doesn't benefit both parties, then their won't be an agreement or their will be a rift.

Fair enough and agree with the last part It doesn't create a problem, as shown but the management so far. If someone doesn't want to stay or is an issue, we let them leave. Exactly

Ah yes, my mistake, however it still isn't nearly as bad as some make it out to be. And if he extends Juve renegotiate the clause. - - - Updated - - - Yea but you hate him :ghey:

It's a 50m release clause in his last year of his contract, how is that bad?

True lmao If both players played under controlled environments then you can make that claim, but you Don't know how either player would coupe in Juve. And we aren't a club to splash 140 m on an underprroven player.

It's honestly smart but , he could just see out the last year and walk away for nothing. HOWEVER, people are complaining about this deal, we got his for relatively nothing and even with the 16m , a player like him could easily go for 40m given the inflated market, stop complaining. And then...