Search results

I like Bayern's 4-4-1-1. We need just RW and maybe sub for LW aka Gio.

This point is more harmful to Juve that any other fuck happening with our club. We should think about future, not the past. We have to choose formation suited for Diego, Gio, Melo etc. With all my respect to Alex, greatest juventino of all time.

Let's make him regista! ;-)))))))))

Giovinco as ML without DL?:snoop: next. Amauri and DP should sit on the bench.

_________Gio_____Iaquinta______ _____________Diego____________ ______Marchisio_____Melo________ _____________Momo____________ Grosso__Chielini__Canna__Caceres Without Gio or Diego (or in rotation purposes) attacking trio converts from 1-2 to 2-1 e.g. Gio/Diego-Camo behind lone striker Iaquinta...

In 4-3-1-2 Camo is playing MCR and that is not his position. But 4-2-2-2 can be useful: __________Striker_______ ____DP________________ _______Diego___________ ________________Camo__ ___Melo_____Momo______ or something like this. Anyway, formation doesn't cont. The roles count. We don't need...

If Camo can't play, we have to play Tiago as MC (Momo+Melo = DMs) and Gio-Diego behind one Striker. So no 4-3-1-2, but 4-3-2-1. Gio can be substituted by Alex (or Alex by Gio), and also Diego<->Gio.

In 4-3-1-2 Camo played, but that wasn't enough. So we need 3 of them on field? Or changing formation without changing players can improve out game?

Gio can play supper striker too.

In terms of quantity we have idial squad for 3-1-2 - 2 players for every position. But now all realized the problem - we have only 1 support striker (DP) and 3 target men. So... we have to move Gio to DP substitution role, Camo to Diego sub and DC or Sali to 6th CM. And all will be ok. In terms...

And that's all?

Main problem for 4-2-3-1 in Juve is that we have no subs for 3=Camo+Diego+Gio :(

I'm sure. Suns is right.

Because in this formation CML and CMR have not only attack, but also defend. And Gio can't defend.

It's clear. So Gio can't play on non-existent position. He will play as trequartista or support striker.

LCM not equal to LW

Where is LW in 4-3-1-2?:shifty: