Search results

That looks more like loan+right to buy half next summer. Like Parma did with Giovinco. If it's a direct co-own, then it's strange that we now only pay 25% of Armero's 50%. Then again, it's Marotta :D

Makes sense to sell, but to teams it doesn't make sense to buy. If we now drop Motta's price to 0.5m eur, why would Bologna buy him and pay his wages instead of just pay his wages by loaning him? They'd do it if Motta agrees to lower his wages, but then why would Motta cut his wages? He's fine...

Ok, this is what I get. Mark thinks Curva is the shit. He trusts him and follows him. But he never managed to make contact with him. Nick on the other hand immediately got under Curva's skin and he's now easily getting info. The sad thing is that Mark's only way to get news from Curva is via...

As did De Vilo.

True, Di Marzio is the real deal. Only Marcelo De Vilo from RAI is more reliable.

I don't know, but it obviously made sense to Nick when he invented this story.

Calm down. I'm joking. I only said that we started negotiations with Jovetic right after the EC final (2 weeks ago). That's the only same thing in my and Nicko's news. The rest is not mine. You can all go back to fapping.

What? You guys were actually believing the news some guy from England provides to you (even more, the guy is Nick) and claims he got them from some Italian poster in an Italian Juve forum? I at least have some lucky guesses from time to time. And I now feel that most of the BS I said about...

Serious question, who was this guy who actually believed my fake info from some days ago and now presents it as his own inside info?

Well, if Pirlo had 13 assists in Juve and Vucinic had 9, then it means that there was someone in Juve to score on those 22 assists :agree: