Search results

He's Danish though :D https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/09/when-it-comes-to-refugees-scandinavia-isnt-quite-the-promised-land/?utm_term=.59937db52ac9

They already have the conclusion. Just looking for pictures to support it.

Turks in charge with Gulen as their leader :tup:

I agree with almost everything, but cannot understand how it helps the Middle East? It won't stop Iran and Saudi Arabia of fucking with each other, will it?

Who are you referring to by "the other side"?

You know I don't have a problem with his judgement, considering time and place. But Muslims believe everything he did was timeless. I can't see how you can pull this shit off in this day and age and not slapped with war crime charges

You hardly find strong sourcing from a middle of a forgotten desert 1400 years ago. But maybe this is stronger for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banu_Qurayza#Demise_of_the_Banu_Qurayza

This is one example. There are many. I read this 10 years ago, and it was very shocking to me at that time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Asma%27_bint_Marwan

Twitter

first of all, that ship has already sailed. They will blame the west forever. second, are you familiar with ISIS ideology? they very much want a confrontation with west to start off their post-apocalyptic world. Similar thing can be said of otyher Islamist groups. Why did AlQaeda attack US? US...

Because they won't only kill each other. They develop a strong terrorist organization in that stateless anarchist dream. Then they come to you. AlQaeda, ISIS and AlShabab all started off in this environment. I'm not suggesting west should interfere. But I see many people see this...

Ha! That was my question a few posts ago too :D I think their culture is to blame too. But disintegration is not only on them. EDIT: Chinese have a significant problem with integration as far as I know.

1- It's a very connected world. Leaving Middle East won't really mean you don't get affected. Actually, except a very limited intervention from US, Syria is mostly left to itself. That did not help did it? If you leave them totally to themselves, chances are they won't come up with a stable...

I get it. It's logical, and it's the quick (although dirty) solution. But this is only one part of a long term solution. A long term solution is to be able to integrate. But unfortunately, looks like Europe is only interested in the first part of the solution. That's not going to work. It's...

How? Most of Syria's land is not run by any state. And without any state that can provide credible background information, It's impossible.

:tup: I'm not sure it's resolved with distribution though. That disintegration seems to be cultural, and I think both cultures are partly to blame.

They are first on Nato's alphabetic list :D

At least for Chinese, there's always such district. Even if there is not, they make sure to stay in touch with only each other mostly. My point was this disintegration does not necessarily result in hostility. Or at least it shouldn't.

Isn't this the same with Chinese and Koreans?