Search results

i still see this as a good transfer and the clause is not bad, if the right to buy back refers only for next year.

i hope not, but i am afraid so, it depends on what other moves we make, we need a decent CF back up, one that can help a bit now, rest Llorente, make him to feel some competition, but no so direct, due to the age difference and then play more than him and still make him rellevant when he is...

But the point is, that we spend our budget on talents that could help us on the future and not player that Conte wants to impove us here and now. It is like we are doing this intentionally to provoke him...

So, we are buying him now to be competitive after Conte is gone?

Would he bench Llorente?

Because Marotta does it every year, even before Conte arrived...

Stop trying to blame Conte for everything, when it is obvious that it was Marotta. We have seen many others players of ours being slipping away like that with Marotta's deals...

After his latest goals Real will extend his contract for sure, either if they will decide to keep him or loan/sell him... Sometimes the negotiations come parallel with loan agreements. Is for the right to buy, it could happen with complicated clauses, like the ones we used to get Asamoah. ITs...

Loan him for one year, with the right to buy his 50% and extend his loan for another year,for lets say smth like 8mil and then we will say that the player is now worthy of 50mil and force them to give us 25mil to get him back, just like Parma did to us with Giovinco! We should stop being at the...

Loan with co-own rights, like we did with Giovinco and Immobile! Time to use those type of deals to our advantage!