Search results

:lol:

I agree, some of the things said about gays was offensive, same as some of the things said about religion. Both are sensitive topics, I would argue there has been more offensive things said about gay people than religion in here though.

Andy went all PMS I hate you all on us :lol:

:lol:

Mexican :lol: ?

This thread is about religion anyway. Hardly off topic. :D

I like to engage in religious debate, I saw that post a few pages back and said....Hey why not?

How do you determine who is the real Jesus and who isn't? You do realise that Jesus is a copy of Horus?

:agree:

Denial happens because of one's environment, the constraints that society places on someone. Regardless of whether it is nature or not. Homosexuality is nature, society's expectations turn into a sin.

I think it would be a denial because let's face it, I don't think anyone want's to be gay. His environment definately was a factor. Conservative catholic mother, little Italian town.

This is the story of my uncle, bar the marriage. Denial, not realisation.

It is not a realisation, it is an awakening from denial.

Actually there is quite a lot to suggest Jesus was the gays. I love the fact that people will not admit that the story of Jesus was stolen from the story of Horus.

I find it amazing that Religious (I am speaking about all religions, not just one in particular) people can worry about the morality behind gay sex and gay marriage. I still have not seen one logical explanation that explains why someone would choose to be gay.

:lol:

:tup: Sex is not a factor anymore, this is not the 1900's where the man works and puts food on the table while the mum parents. We are passed that.

Two dads can parent just as well as a mum and a dad. As long as there is love that is the basis of what a child needs. The same thing can be said about a mum and a dad.

Yes, it is a dated theory.

Why? Love is love, sex doesn't matter.