Search results

All sources agree that 3mil are only enough for 50% of his contract. All sources agree that we have accepted the Cessena has the right to buy 50% of his contract, by giving us back 3mil of the 6mil we gave at them. All sources agree that we have allocated 6mil for his acquisition, the same...

since when your interpretation on the sporting rules is more reliable? Even the juventus.com claims its a 6mil acquisition, 3mil are only good enough for 50% at any case, thats crystal clear there too. To keep 100% of the player, we need at least 6mil

the official site does not defies the goal.com explanation of what sharing agreement (ex art. 102 bis N.O.I.F.) actually means...

thats what goal.com says too and there are more details http://www.goal.com/en/news/11/transfer-zone/2011/08/25/2635914/official-juventus-sign-emanuele-giaccherini-from-cesena-for Juventus have completed the transfer of Emanuele Giaccherini by paying Cesena €6 million for him, but the Emilia...

you are wrong, we paid 6mil, they are not committed to give us back the 3mil, if they dont opt to, they just have the right to do so. We committed the 6mil for his acquisition, they will give us 3mil, IF they want to buy back his half, and then our 3mil will only mean 50% of his contract. But...

we bought him for 6mil, we have committed 6mil for his acquisition. If we keep him, we will not recover not even a penny of this 6mil. If/when he fails, which is extremely likely to happen, but not certain, we will only pay this 6mil, if he somehow does well, they have the right to buy back half...

6mil could land us Lugano, i player we need, a player that Gentile favors more than Alex, but we preferred yet another SS, so we would rather 8 option in the forward line...

:tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport:

I hereby declare Jack as my official Word Bearer!!

Ital Juve project didnt start this season, the fact is though, that is still active, the proof is that this season we still made biased decision to the italian number favors. (by keeping Italian players who failed and giving away foreigners who didnt) We ve replaced 2 foreign fullbacks (traorem...

they are not, thatsd why we hesitate to buy them, because they would delute our italian percentage... we didnt hesitate to bring in the ones already aproved by the italian fans though, but a stranieri, that havent served in the legions... must be at least be as good as Krasic or Vidal to be...

But isnt Giachierini a priority?

Because we are only interested on Italian forwards?

What titles they have earned as coaches, to earn our respect?? We are talking about Juve's bench here, not Siena's...

You seem to forget that despite Pirlo, Pazienza, we also bought the other 4 Italian loaned players, even the ones who have failed. 6 New Italian players and the current 6 Italian players will form our Italian core. We systematically eradicated most of the stranieri we had, even the ones who had...

so far yes... we did everything wrong, except the Licht deal... We repeated the same mistakes we did the last years, again fail to sell players for decent prices. Again failed to avoid selling off some players, for no particularly logical reason. Again spent the most part of our budget on the...

What are we waiting for?? The sign of of Lugano for 3.5 mil and Vargas for 10mil+Amauri, could turn a disastrous mercato, into a half decent one...

esp in the defense...

indeed atm, the LB starter position seems to be our greatest problem.

This transfer rumor must be just media BS, we are only interest on mediocre Italien...