Search results

  1. Lo-Pan

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 0-2 Palermo (Feb. 28th 2010)

    I will agree that our chances of making fourth depend, significantly, on this decision. My gravest concern is that when fit, rather than allow us to try the 442, Zach will use Camo or Gio, not both, to take Diego's role, and give the little man a breather. Still, that would be better than...
  2. Lo-Pan

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 0-2 Palermo (Feb. 28th 2010)

    A mild positive to take from the result is that Zach held up his hands after and admitted we were poor...'couldnt hurt a fly'. Perhaps fatigue has played its part. This is especially likely to be a problem when we see such a horrible lack of steam in our team as a whole, very little determined...
  3. Lo-Pan

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 0-2 Palermo (Feb. 28th 2010)

    The problem with moving from our current 3412 and 4312 back to a 442, is that we unless we include Diego as a second striker, or pushed high up the field behind a target man, either Trez, or Iquinta, or Amauri, we are going to be lightweight in the middle, and also leaving out of the starting XI...
  4. Lo-Pan

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 0-2 Palermo (Feb. 28th 2010)

    Its hardly worth mentioning that you had a stance a week ago that our success, in recent games, was due to the form of most in form player, for that period. I don't see the point in mentioning it...rather than as a childish I TOLD YOU SO...which is not supporting Juve, its supporting yourself...
  5. Lo-Pan

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 0-2 Palermo (Feb. 28th 2010)

    is the Camo absence confirmed?
  6. Lo-Pan

    [Serie A] JUVENTUS 0-2 Palermo (Feb. 28th 2010)

    DP has been in his best run of form all season, in recent weeks. When we have lost Amauri for another month, trez barely match fit, Iaquinta still dead, and even the little Giovinco on the injured list, its madness to suggest taking out of our offensive line, the ONLY match sharp player of...