Search results

You're talking to a brick wall when it comes to the loan/co-own clowns. They've never played football before, so they wouldn't know about how the lack of team chemistry and a consistent message can actually destroy players. That's why some environments do not always work out for certain...

With the straight 4-4-2, no point in keeping Tiago. He's going to be gone.

Congratulations to the loan lovers. Hopefully we'll see him again. If not, best of luck to Marrone. With Poulsen getting closer to Liverpool and Ekdal seemingly on the way to Bologna, we might be left with just three central midfielders. If so, then we'll have to buy another CM or DM.

Why is it a good idea? Do these loans guarantee playing time for our youngsters? No, they do not. You send a kid like Iago away on loan for the year and he spends his time with Bari Primavera. I'm not entirely certain, but I think he'd get better training at Juve even if he doesn't play...

Or if they have talent, they either come back to not have a spot on the team or they don't want to come back because we didn't give them a chance in the first place. But of course, we have to provide them with that magnificent playing time, a mystical fairy godmother that trumps all other...

How about keep him and allow him to work his way into the team over the course of a couple years, training with the mainstays of the team so that he becomes one? Ever fucking thunk of that idea before screaming, LOAN HIM, LOAN HIM, LOAN HIM?

:seven:

Wow, that Jack Wilshire must have found the fountain of youth. :D

It would be fun to ship Molinaro off on loan to some undisclosed location.

:sergio:

Now lets not start getting carried away here and kissing each others' asses. The kid has a long ways to go. I'm just glad that he isn't loaned out yet.

Will this guy ruin Marchisio's development? I hope so. :seven: