Search results

Ok, Ze and Seven, would you kindly continue this via PM?

Yes I know what you mean but given their potential it was not in their dreams, just like us, it was never in our dreams to compete for any title and yet we were close to competing.

Based on their ojectives set at the beginning what they achieved is a success. If they had a chance to succeed even more and couldn't make it, then it's basically irrelevant.

I don't think it was in Genoa's objective to reach a CL spot. They can celebrate playing European football, it was a great achievement. On paper, squads like Palermo and Napoli looked much better, hell even Roma and look where Genoa are.

Can you confirm that?

4-2-4 is actually a flat 4-4-2 with more attacking minded side midfielders making it a more exposed tactic.

Ranieri 4-4-2

You're not going to drop it, are you? I see that my decision was sound and it didn't harm anyone. If you think it is really important kindly refer to the moderators thread where all feedback is appreciated. Now we can continue discussing Ranieri and his substitute if any.

It's not that he got banned nor given an infraction, not even a warning so I don't see what has gone overboard.

What is much? It is simply stated that the site is not allowed, why is it that hard to understand?

ESPECIALLY GARGANESE ARTICLES. Do you understand or shall I spell it for you?

RB = Motta LB = De Ceglie

Are you suggesting a wage increase so he can pull better results? Are you aware of the consequences of what you just said if Secco has spies on this board?

I'd assign Conte just for this:

I think so too. Threads merged.

That's Carlo Ancelotti's formation.

Among the three I like Conte most but at the same time I like his formation the least. I actually don't like it at all.

I knew you would also love that :D Did you check my reply?

The creativity in this place is going to waste. Some people should go to talent shows.