Search results

i see your idea behind it, yet i don't completely agree. Of course, from a highlight-video you can see if the guy has some skills or not, i mean that's for sure, but since the quaresma-subject came up; I think we can agree that quaresma-videos are like one of the most spectacular things. And...

what if i made you a youtube-video of all the wrong passes cristiano ronaldo made, or all the balls that giovinco lost while dribbling or something. Would that make the player worthless then? If lucho makes some awesome passes against a non-existing Portuguese defense, that's one thing - but...

wait wait wait. let me get this straight; you're actually rating players based upon their youtube videos... wow, that's just.... wow... please tell me you're joking. Some video about some fancy passes or tricks says nothing about a player. You know, you can't rate a player based on...

Kovac? wtf? WHAT FOR?? And to lucho... i prefer aquilani for the same price. this article is bullshit imo

don't get me wrong; he IS talented. but he's not the juve-type of player. he doesn't fit the style... i can't really see why you guys are talking about him, because the chances he comes to juve are near 0. we are linked with a bazillion of different players, but not with quaresma. once again...

Quaresma?? why should quaresma join us? We are not the type of team who buys players like him. Then again, he'll probably cost half a fortune. Hell we are not even linked with him. I wouldn't even want him... he's spectacular and all, but who needs that? for his price, i'd prefer a diego, or...