Search results

Although Rosicky is quality, he's not as good as Nedved. And if given a choice I'd still take Riquelme over him.

Man Utd or Chelski may bid perhaps.

So now he's inconcistent and uniterested. So why are we consistently interested in him?

dude, you're bored.

I think Mutu can do a better distribution job than Rosicky.

Yea, and I'd even be willing for the club to dish out tht sum of money if Rosicky had been more consistent. His flashes of brilliance are not enough for us to build the foundations of our attack for the next 5 years. If we got him for less than 10, then at least the risk is more nominal, and we...

I'm glad too.... :P On a more serious note, i think 10 mil, for Rosicky would be ridiculous if Cassano, Chivu and anyone else are actually part of our transfer plans. And besides, i think there are better, more consistent alternatives in the market, like Quaresma, who may even cost less.

10 is too much imo, considering we're going to have a budget that involves bringing in 2 more defenders as well. And considering theyre looking more for the money more than a player + cash deal, its going to be unlikely to pull this one off.

@ ZhiXin...dude i was talking about Rosicky.

Although i hvaent seen him in domestic competition, i think he seems the player who lacks consistency.