Search results

Well I could counter-argue that boycotting is also a personal choice and falls under "freedom";). The boycotting option was the last solution actually, other diplomatic channels were ventured, but it fell on deaf ears.:)

Sorry I read my posts before I post them, I still stand by what I said. Anyways I think this argument is fruitless. Most Muslims got offended by what was published by that newspaper and thats the bottem line. A newspaper doubting the Holocousts would make the whole world stand up and never sit...

Because we Muslims never depict the prophet in our art, movies, film...etc. There in not one single drawing of him drawn by a Muslim artist throughout 14 centuries. They refused to draw him or depict him and we also refuse that also. That and coupled with depicting him as a terrorist, murderer...

I have seen them, as Maresca said, one of the cartoons was a man wearing a turban and a bomb in it, you know those black cartoonish bombs. In another one the cartoonist drew 5 or 6 different characters all aligned beside each other in a police station and what seems to be a witness looking...

We??

You want him to say yes he was offended, so you can go and tell us how you are not a religious fanatic??:;)