Rate mercato 2014/15 (1 Viewer)

Mercato (1 = terrible, 10 = great)

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
95,978
#1
We had some needs, did we fulfill them all? Vote!

- - - Updated - - -

With a new good CB for BonBon/Ogbonna/Marrone and some nice creativity up front it would have been a solid 9/10.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
95,978
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #4
    First.

    - - - Updated - - -

    7/10

    - - - Updated - - -

    I see Mark changed his mind. :lol:
    Where's 5.5?

    @X ban him!

    + that extra 0.5 can be for Rabiot now that the deadline passed. :p
     

    Völler

    Always spot on
    May 6, 2012
    23,091
    #6
    I'm somewhere between a 4 and 5, but ended up voting 4. We have made a few good signings (Coman and Evra), but the fact that we haven't strengthened our starting 11 is very disappointing. Romulo and Pereyra have secured us more depth, and while Romulo seems like a good transfer, Pereyra's option to buy is too high. Also, I really hate the Morata signing because of the buy-back clause.
     

    zizinho

    Senior Member
    Apr 14, 2013
    51,814
    #8
    i was thinking about picking something between 1 and 10. chose 8 in the end because of Coman and the money from the players we offloaded
     

    Vlad

    In Allegri We Trust
    May 23, 2011
    22,580
    #9
    We've improved our first team, made it more competitive, but didn't add quality defender in the end. For me a defender should have been one of our priorities. Bonucci and Ogbonna don't inspire much confidence. 7/10
     

    Zacheryah

    Senior Member
    Aug 29, 2010
    42,251
    #10
    7/10

    +improved the bench a big deal
    +kept key players
    +added very talented players. depending on how sturaro and coman develop, this can change to 9/10
    +sold deadwood we could actually sell

    - didnt do more to get nastasic
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,347
    #11
    Where's 5.5?

    @X ban him!

    + that extra 0.5 can be for Rabiot now that the deadline passed. :p
    :mad:

    You were give him a 5/10 like 3 days ago. :D

    - - - Updated - - -

    7/10

    +improved the bench a big deal
    +kept key players
    +added very talented players. depending on how sturaro and coman develop, this can change to 9/10
    +sold deadwood we could actually sell

    - didnt do more to get nastasic
    Short and sweet. :tup:
     

    zizinho

    Senior Member
    Apr 14, 2013
    51,814
    #12
    7/10

    +improved the bench a big deal
    +kept key players
    +added very talented players. depending on how sturaro and coman develop, this can change to 9/10
    +sold deadwood we could actually sell

    - didnt do more to get nastasic
    with this it would be a clear 10 to me. only failure in this mercato
     

    X Æ A-12

    Senior Member
    Contributor
    Sep 4, 2006
    86,613
    #13
    what happened with De Ceglie? Another loan?

    - - - Updated - - -

    6/10. bit of a let down but not as much of a disaster as has been made out to be.
     
    OP

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    95,978
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #14
    :mad:

    You were give him a 5/10 like 3 days ago. :D

    - - - Updated - - -


    Short and sweet. :tup:
    no, that was Voller.

    - - - Updated - - -

    what happened with De Ceglie? Another loan?

    - - - Updated - - -

    6/10. bit of a let down but not as much of a disaster as has been made out to be.
    loaned to Parma and paid 2/3 of wages.
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,024
    #15
    Decent enough mercato.

    Kept key players.

    Added some solid players who will give tactical flexibility as well as good depth.

    Signed a couple of interesting youngsters.

    Don't feel that there were any glaring opportunites that Juve failed to capitalise on.

    In terms of squad numbers, I'd say Juve could have done with another forward of some description, rather like I felt they were one midfielder short last season.

    What does that equate to numerically?

    6.5?

    Though I'd be more inclined to give a 6 than a 7 to fit the poll options.
     

    PhRoZeN

    Livin with Mediocre
    Mar 29, 2006
    15,834
    #18
    Okay..

    Positives
    +Evra & Coman
    +Bye Bye Vuci and Quag
    +Kept Vidal

    So-So
    ~Pereyra
    ~Morata

    Not convinced
    - Romolu
    - Expected a good CB cover & a 'big' signing

    A solid 6.
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,024
    #19
    how about not getting nastasic @Red
    Hard to say when he hasn't moved, so we don't know the terms he would have been available on.

    And if no-one came in with an offer for any of Juve's current centre-halves, I don't suppose signing him was going to be an option, regardless of the terms of the deal.
     

    Stevie

    ..........
    Mar 30, 2003
    17,612
    #20
    I voted 4 but that can easily change from anything from 7 to a 10 depending on how comman, morata and pereyra turn out as they are un proven as of now so its really hard to judge tbh. Bravo to our management for keeping our best players. Shame about conte but i think Alegri will win me over he already nearly has.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)