Bye Bye Homo sapien, Hello Homo evolutis (1 Viewer)

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
65,499
#1
We are Homo sapiens, the most advance form of humans this earth has ever seen. We can stand up straight, think deeper and faster than any other species of man AND we have iPhones. Homo sapiens do not even have to worry about Darwinian natural selection anymore due to the institution of civilized society. Our food is available on shelves, homes are built, and water is never in short supply. So are we still evolving?

Juan Enriquez, a well-respected futurist, thinks the answer is a definite yes. He theorizes that we as a species are going to see a shift in the near future from Homo sapien to Homo evolutis, or a “Hominid that takes direct control over the evolution of their species and others.” The method by which we will transform into such a species is new technology that is advancing at a virtually exponential level. This is resulting from the idea that we are developing technology that makes creating new technology easier and faster. The resulting trend of spiraling upward has brought us to a point where anything currently is, or will be in the near future, possible. Examples of this range from the creation of robotic cells that can be programmed to do anything to robots that can move and react to the environment just like humans can. Enriquez says it this combination of biological and robotical engineering that will lead to the Homo evolutis species:

“We will likely see glimpses of this long-lived, partly mechanical, partly regrown creature that continues to rapidly drive its own evolution. As the branches of the tree of life, and of hominids, continue to grow and spread, many of our grandchildren will likely engineer themselves into what we would consider a new species, one with extraordinary capabilities, a homo evolutis.

Enriquez reasons that intersection of super-advance cellular, biological, and mechanical engineers will render man the ability to change his body and his genetics. Yes, we currently have artificial hearts and prosthetic limbs, but Enriquez is talking about being able to modify the human body and carry on that trait through DNA. For example, blindess has always been completely incurable, but scientists have built a mechanism so that the blind can differentiate between light and dark. This technology is going to advance to a level where artificial eyes catch up to human eyes and eventually surpass them. In Enriquez’s video from the 2009 TED conference, he also mentions recent successes in DNA technology, like adding an extra wing to a chicken. There is even the possibility of limb and nerve cell regeneration thanks to an endangered animal called the Axolotl, which can even re-grow parts of its brain.

The clincher for the evolutionary change, however, is the fact that we can take the regenerative ability outfrom the Axolotl and put it into the DNA of other species and eventually our own. We can construct these amazing tools and integration into the human genome is soon to come. The possibilities are endless: Want to have perfect hearing forever? No problem. Need a new heart, liver, leg or brain? That’s a piece of cake. But the real significance of this idea is that which goes beyond these basic fixes, such as night vision and indestructible limbs. Enriquez’s theory brings up several questions:

1) Will we reach a point where we can no longer be defined as human? Should we even care?
2) With the human race being as flawed as it is, what will be the repercussions of making people super-human?
3) How will this affect society as a whole? (workforce, criminality, warfare, etc.)

http://www.highexistence.com/bye-bye-homo-sapien-hello-homo-evolutis/
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
OP
Quetzalcoatl

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
65,499
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #5
    What I'm really interested in are the questions at the end:

    1) Will we reach a point where we can no longer be defined as human? Should we even care?
    2) With the human race being as flawed as it is, what will be the repercussions of making people super-human?
    3) How will this affect society as a whole? (workforce, criminality, warfare, etc.)
     
    OP
    Quetzalcoatl

    Quetzalcoatl

    It ain't hard to tell
    Aug 22, 2007
    65,499
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #7
    You don't have to know anything, but maybe you have opinions on the issue. Where do we stop being human?
     

    Bozi

    The Bozman
    Administrator
    Oct 18, 2005
    22,740
    #9
    well we have already sold out souls to Apple,yup Apple owns all of our souls and has image rights for the next 3,00 years...its all there in the leaflet for your shiny-shiny iPod...but i guess you didn't read that far down the print

    anyhoo.....now we are a society of soulless humanoids,easily distracted by shiny toys,how our bodies evolve is simply inconsequential
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,819
    #12
    Guys, as long as humans have this built in, wired instinct to reproduce, we'll always be human. Male/Female dynamics will keep us human forever.
     

    mikhail

    Senior Member
    Jan 24, 2003
    9,576
    #14
    What I'm really interested in are the questions at the end:

    1) Will we reach a point where we can no longer be defined as human? Should we even care?
    No. There is no 'point'. There's a range. There's no clear definition of species. This may clarify what I mean by that.

    2) With the human race being as flawed as it is, what will be the repercussions of making people super-human?
    3) How will this affect society as a whole? (workforce, criminality, warfare, etc.)
    It depends. It depends on so many variables that this question is in the realm of hard science fiction rather than any meaningful social discussion.


    there is no way to know. as mikhail said it, you're better off, much better off, reading arthur c. clarke
    I think Clarke didn't address that particular subject so much, though he is one of the few people I've read who really does constitute a 'futurist' - I mean, he came up with the idea of geostationary orbit! Much of his work is a bit dated now. I haven't read anything he wrote in a few years though, so perhaps I'm forgetting something relevant.

    The science fiction author closest to the subject (that I'm aware of - big caveat) is Alastair Reynolds. He deals with technology-augmented humanity, genetically modified subspecies and societal implications in his books, though mostly in the background of space opera.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)