Gay couples as fit to adopt as heterosexuals: study (4 Viewers)

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#1
NEW YORK (Reuters Life!) - Gay or straight, the sexual orientation of adoptive parents does not have an impact on the emotional development of their children, according to a new study.

But researchers said that if parents were satisfied with the adoption process, had a stable income and functioned well as a family the risk of emotional problems in children were reduced.

"We found that sexual orientation of the adoptive parents was not a significant predictor of emotional problems," Paige Averett, an assistant professor of social work at East Carolina University, said in a statement.

"We did find, however, that age and pre-adoptive sexual abuse were," she added.

Averett, Blace Nalavany, also of East Carolina University, and Scott Ryan, dean of the University of Texas School of Social Work, questioned nearly 1,400 couples in the United States, including 155 gay and lesbian parents.

They used information from Florida's public child welfare system and data from gay and lesbian couples throughout the U.S. for the study.

Each couple was questioned about themselves and their children, the family composition and dynamics, and the history of the child before the adoption.

The researchers said the findings, which are reported in the journal Adoption Quarterly, are important because it compared gay and lesbian and heterosexual couples.

"There are implications for social work educators, adoption professionals, and policy makers in this and other recent studies," said Averett.

"We must pay attention to the data indicating that gay and lesbian parents are as fit as heterosexual parents to adopt," Averett added, "because at least 130,000 children are depending on us to act as informed advocates on their behalf."

The American Civil Liberties Union has said that laws and adoption agency policies have created obstacles for gay and lesbian couple who want to adopt children.

(Reporting by Patricia Reaney, editing by Paul Casciato)

http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE58O3MK20090925

===

Well, look at that. Decades of wisdom based entirely on people's own assumptions squashed. Who would have thought.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
OP
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #4
    Eℓvin;2159761 said:
    This is disgusting.
    I bet you wouldn't say that about the lesbian couple that lives across the street from me. They have twins.
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,810
    #5
    No, but then again. My morals are not perfect, and my rules are not fair.
    In my world gaydom is disgusting. Lesbianism is only acceptable in porn, in real life only hot lesbians are in good book.

    PS I am not Texan :D
     

    Sadomin

    Senior Member
    Apr 5, 2005
    7,203
    #6
    Eℓvin;2159764 said:
    No, but then again. My morals are not perfect, and my rules are not fair.
    In my world gaydom is disgusting. Lesbianism is only acceptable in porn, in real life only hot lesbians are in good book.
    Personal morals are one thing.

    Are you against giving homosexual more legal rights (such as adoption), however?
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,810
    #8
    Personal morals are one thing.

    Are you against giving homosexual more legal rights (such as adoption), however?
    Of course I am.

    Think like this: you and your wife die in a car crash, you have a 4 year old son, none of you have any relatives. Would you be okay with 2 homos who suck each others deformed cocks kissing your son good night?

    If yes, then vote for that. Enjoy.
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,810
    #9
    @Elvin
    I know, we don't take you seriously anyway :wink:
    And you never should. Not on the Internet. I never take anything, and I mean anything seriously here. Hell, I'd be surprised if I ever spent more than 4-5 seconds thinking before posting.

    Gotta love the freedom here, I mean I've enjoyed it for years.
    In real life, I'm like the most well spoken guy ever, i choose my words carefully and i speak when there's little other option. And when I do speak, I make sure people are listening.

    Don't take me seriously here, this is nothing but amusement, and sometimes quality time killing.

    Love ya...
     

    Sadomin

    Senior Member
    Apr 5, 2005
    7,203
    #11
    Eℓvin;2159771 said:
    Of course I am.

    Think like this: you and your wife die in a car crash, you have a 4 year old son, none of you have any relatives. Would you be okay with 2 homos who suck each others deformed cocks kissing your son good night?

    If yes, then vote for that. Enjoy.
    Certainly, if those 2 homos are loving and caring people I'd much rather my children live with them than on the streets or in a children's home.

    What they do in their bedroom is no business of mine. How much do you know about your parents' sex life?
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,810
    #12
    Ok first big flaw in this whole thing is taking Gays and Lesbians, women and men as equals. They're not equals, they're not same.
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #13
    This is so sad, such a decision is going to based on 1400 interviews...
    If you're a policy maker worth your salt you don't make a decision based on a single study. Nevertheless, 1400 is a very solid sample size. How many would you use, 1500? 2000? 200,000? When is the finding "definite"?

    How many times would you drop a ball to the floor before you decide "everytime I drop it, it falls"?
     

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    88,433
    #14
    Certainly, if those 2 homos are loving and caring people I'd much rather my children live with them than on the streets or in a children's home.

    What they do in their bedroom is no business of mine. How much do you know about your parents' sex life?
    Why do you compare if it has to be 2 homos or children's home? Why not 2 homos or 2 heterosexuals?
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,810
    #15
    This is so fucked up man, now the whole market is gonna emerge from this, making as many kids as possible to sell to rich gay couples.

    When there is demand (legalized) there's got to be supply. Watch out Philipino orphans...
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #16
    Eℓvin;2159772 said:
    In real life, I'm like the most well spoken guy ever, i choose my words carefully and i speak when there's little other option. And when I do speak, I make sure people are listening.
    Eℓvin;2159772 said:
    Don't take me seriously here, this is nothing but amusement, and sometimes quality time killing.
    Good, I will not take your claims about your well spokenness seriously :D
     

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    88,433
    #18
    If you're a policy maker worth your salt you don't make a decision based on a single study. Nevertheless, 1400 is a very solid sample size. How many would you use, 1500? 2000? 200,000? When is the finding "definite"?

    How many times would you drop a ball to the floor before you decide "everytime I drop it, it falls"?
    No, I find it stupid that it had to be an interview to do the studies that will later on officialize the adopting of gay couples. Even before they started I'd know they would come out with such decision, it was that simple. They might be gays but it's not like their IQ has to be below 15.
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #19
    No, I find it stupid that it had to be an interview to do the studies that will later on officialize the adopting of gay couples. Even before they started I'd know they would come out with such decision, it was that simple. They might be gays but it's not like their IQ has to be below 15.
    So the whole study is cooked then? So do you trust any studies at all? (Especially any ones that don't agree with your preconceptions?)

    For your information interview is the standard method of doing a study in psychology (have you ever been given an anonymous survey to do at school? we used to get them all the time). It's also what happens when you go see a therapist, it's interview form, he talks to you. What else do you propose to do?

    Btw I also find interesting you assumption that out of 1400 kids and parents who were interviewed, all of them lied, as if they had made a big meeting prior to the interviews and decided to agree on a common story.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    52,497
    #20
    Eℓvin;2159782 said:
    This is so fucked up man, now the whole market is gonna emerge from this, making as many kids as possible to sell to rich gay couples.
    Damn! And you're giving me this idea now when i decided to stop making children :(
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)