He has acknowledged that there is a problem (1 Viewer)

Jan 7, 2004
29,704
#2
'It is simply insane for any player to 'earn' £6million-£8million a year when the annual budget of even a club competing in the UEFA Champions League may be less than half that. What logic, right or economic necessity would qualify a man in his mid-20s to demand to earn in a month a sum that his own father - and the majority of fans - could not hope to earn in a decade?'
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
#3
++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++
'It is simply insane for any player to 'earn' £6million-£8million a year when the annual budget of even a club competing in the UEFA Champions League may be less than half that. What logic, right or economic necessity would qualify a man in his mid-20s to demand to earn in a month a sum that his own father - and the majority of fans - could not hope to earn in a decade?'
If he generates for his employers the kind of revenue the top clubs actually earn, yes, he deserves it. Maybe a cap on stadium size, ticket price and merchandising income is in order? No - that's insane, isn't it. Well then, let the guys earning the money see a fair percentage of it.
 

Gep

The Guv'nor
Jun 12, 2005
16,418
#6
++ [ originally posted by 674083912 ] ++
I agree with him. Ive always wondered why famous people always earn so damn much
Especially when most of them dont deserve it!
 

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
#9
++ [ originally posted by 674083912 ] ++
I agree with him. Ive always wondered why famous people always earn so damn much
Don't be too fast. Here's the same article, only from a less pro-Blatter source. This is from PZC newspaper in Holland:

HYPOCRITICAL BLATTER STRIKES AGAIN

Sepp Blatter, the man who's bad sense of business made FIFA loose an estimated €22 million in 2002 and who has always carefully concealed his own salary and that of the people around him, has now attacked a far more transparent system: the capitalist ways in which the salaries of players are being publically established.


Indeed, the financial world surrounding the FIFA president is all but transparent as the organisation has been constantly accused of financial scandals and drama's. The minimum wage in Holland is €526.- and it would be justifiable if those people were to raise some complaints on the prices of, for example, season tickets of their favourite clubs. But it can be argued that a man who has been accused of being involved in bribes ranging up to €100,000 would be wise to sit back and be quiet regarding the finances of Europe's biggest football clubs.

----------------------------

Now that's another way to look at it...
 

Dragon

Senior Member
Apr 24, 2003
27,407
#10
++ [ originally posted by Erik ] ++


Don't be too fast. Here's the same article, only from a less pro-Blatter source. This is from PZC newspaper in Holland:

HYPOCRITICAL BLATTER STRIKES AGAIN

Sepp Blatter, the man who's bad sense of business made FIFA loose an estimated €22 million in 2002 and who has always carefully concealed his own salary and that of the people around him, has now attacked a far more transparent system: the capitalist ways in which the salaries of players are being publically established.


Indeed, the financial world surrounding the FIFA president is all but transparent as the organisation has been constantly accused of financial scandals and drama's. The minimum wage in Holland is €526.- and it would be justifiable if those people were to raise some complaints on the prices of, for example, season tickets of their favourite clubs. But it can be argued that a man who has been accused of being involved in bribes ranging up to €100,000 would be wise to sit back and be quiet regarding the finances of Europe's biggest football clubs.

----------------------------

Now that's another way to look at it...
I guess Blatter isnt innocent either, but I still think its crazy how much money famous people earn
 
OP
Chxta

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #11
    Playing the devil's advocate ehn Erik?

    An interesting way to look at it, yes, but then again, no one here said that Blatter was a saint...
     

    Nicole

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2004
    7,561
    #12
    ++ [ originally posted by Chxta ] ++
    Read

    Nice to note that the egg head has finally agreed that spiralling wages and transfer fees are indeed a serious problem for our football. Wonder what they are actually going to do about it.
    1. Its FIFA, they have no real power anymore.

    2. Even if they could, they will not and never will try to do anything. Spineless :)
     

    Dan

    Back & Quack
    Mar 9, 2004
    9,290
    #13
    Let market forces decide the players wages I say. If clubs generate so much money, its only right that the players earn so much money.
     

    Geof

    Senior Member
    May 14, 2004
    6,740
    #15
    It seems pretty obvious that the best players are paid the most. It's just the same in big companies You want the best managers? attract them with the best wages...

    That's capitalism. What is Sepp gonna do against that...?
     
    OP
    Chxta

    Chxta

    Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
    Nov 1, 2004
    12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #17
    Spoilsport techies armed with firewall fun-deflectors mean the Fiver
    has to be careful about using certain 'obscene' words and phrases.
    Like "Sc*nthorpe", for example. Or "Up the Ars*nal!" So when Fifa
    president Sepp Blatter started talking about "p*rnographic" amounts
    of money while speaking sensibly for the first time in living memory,
    the Fiver was left with no option but to reach for its giant jar of
    asterisks so we could big up the little man.

    In a Financial Times interview, Blatter condemned "the greed ruling
    the world of football" and described some transfers made in the
    modern market as "social and economic r*pe". He also vowed to set up
    a task force focusing on corruption and ownership issues in the game,
    which the Fiver presumes will work in tandem with his other task
    force focusing on extra tight and skimpy Lycra for women footballers.

    "All too often, the source of this wealth is individuals with little
    or no history of interest in the game, who have happened upon
    football as a means of serving some hidden agenda," thundered
    Blatter, as a nearby Russian billionaire harrumphed loudly. Blatter
    went on to condemn wage negotiations that "produce the spectacle of
    semi-educated players on GBP100,000-per-week holding clubs to ransom
    until they get, say, GBP120,000," as a nearby England defender looked
    chuffed to be described as semi-educated.

    Shamelessly defending the indefensible, as usual, brass-necked PFA big
    cheese Gordon Taylor reacted with anger to Blatter's comments. "I
    find it bizarre that the head of Fifa, an organisation which has
    built its huge wealth on the back of players, is having a go at those
    same players. He is biting the hand that feeds him," he hissed,
    conveniently overlooking the "p*rnographic" manner in which his
    association's hugely wealthy members gnaw voraciously at the hands of
    the fans who feed them.
     

    Tifoso

    Sempre e solo Juve
    Aug 12, 2005
    5,162
    #18
    ++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++
    'It is simply insane for any player to 'earn' £6million-£8million a year when the annual budget of even a club competing in the UEFA Champions League may be less than half that. What logic, right or economic necessity would qualify a man in his mid-20s to demand to earn in a month a sum that his own father - and the majority of fans - could not hope to earn in a decade?'
    His father and the majority of fans can't play as well as he does. ;)
     
    Jan 7, 2004
    29,704
    #19
    its not about that lou. its how big the wages have gone and how that affects smaller clubs and fans. it has come to a point that clubs like chelsea can not only afford to buy players that they need but also get players that other teams need and keep them on the bench
     

    Layce Erayce

    Senior Member
    Aug 11, 2002
    9,116
    #20
    Clearly Chelsea's economic activity is having a disruptive influence on the game. The likes of Veron, Crespo, Mutu not even fit to sit on the bench?

    But to be fair, we all knew this would happen the moment people started commercializing aspects of the game.

    The same old capitalist monster of class differences rears its ugly head, after, like a virus it invaded a game originally viewed as recreational and a form of entertainment.

    After all, playing football is more fun than watching football.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)